What is Evangelism… Really?

Posted on October 7 2008 by John Hardin

In recent years, evangelism has meant a Church organized “soul-winning” effort in which an open invitation is given to the Church members to meet at a given time to either canvas a residential area with door hangers and tracts, or to go door to door to make personal contacts and share the good news of the gospel. However it is performed, it seems that the Churches have taken on the burden of making sure the community is evangelized. Some Christians recognize the personal responsibility to evangelize, and set aside personal time for themselves to make visits, or to hand out tracts. But is this really what evangelism is? Does evangelism mean to just simply tell others about Christ? I don’t think so… I believe there is more to it than simply ‘preaching the gospel’.

Here are a couple of passages that are typically used to draw our conclusions about evangelism:

Matthew 28:19-20 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

Acts 5:42 And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.

First of all, I would like to point out that neither of these passages imply that door-to-door salesman-like evangelism is the ‘only’ method approved by the Bible. Secondly, neither of these passages imply that it is the duty of the Churches to organize evangelism. I know, this may sound completely contrary to what you have been taught and what you believe; but before you turn me off, I ask you to hear me out.

While Church-wide evangelism can be effective, it is by no means the most appropriate method of evangelism and is certainly not the most efficient. Anyone who has been involved with organized soul-winning knows that Churches that organize evangelism typically only have about 3-5% of the membership show up. To me, that seems like a problem. No Church can efficiently evangelize a community with only 3-5% of the membership participating. Unless your Church has 100% of community as members… then evangelism is superfluous. Of course 100% saturation is a rarity. In most cases, for the Christian sharing their faith to be effective, a certain level of trust and credibility must be established with the prospective convert before they will give a second thought to the message being presented. This cannot be done in 3 minutes standing at a door with a crying toddler in the next room. The door to door soul winner has a disadvantage right from the start because they have no credibility at all to present their message; but shouldn’t that person have already heard the gospel from one of the dozens or hundreds of people he or she comes in contact with on a daily basis? What about the Christian lady at work that sits at the next desk over; or the man that bags her groceries; or the teller at the bank she visits regularly? Why didn’t she already hear the good news from one of those people? Surely a Christian that has regular contact with a prospective convert has an advantage over a door to door soul winner because they have had the opportunity to present themselves as a living epistle; as the Apostle Paul described the Christians in Corinth:

2Co 3:2-3 Ye are our epistle written in our hearts, known and read of all men: [Forasmuch as ye are] manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.

Now, I realize that Churches have taken up organizing evangelism because there is an obvious lack in personal evangelism by Christians on their own; but to me, this seems like the wrong approach. The duty of the Church is to edify the Saints through preaching and teaching. If the ‘Saints’ aren’t evangelizing (which they are not, even when organized soul-winning is available) it is a symptom that the Saints aren’t growing and being edified by the Church. It seems that a more efficient evangelism project would consist of discipling the members that your Church already has, and helping them to grow personally in their relationship with the Lord that they don’t need to have a 2 hour slot dedicated to knocking doors in order for them to evangelize… they will be evangelizing in every situation and circumstance they find themselves in, in their daily lives.

In this scenario, you will have more people sharing the gospel, and doing it more often than a few people going out knocking on random doors like a vacuum salesman. Not that God can’t use that, I know He can. But I don’t think that’s necessarily what Acts 5:42 was describing. I think Acts 5:42 was describing people going about their daily lives from sun up to sun down while sharing the gospel with those they came in contact with. I believe this is what was intended when our Lord commanded us to take the gospel into every nation, and I believe this is what was being described in Acts 5:42 when Jesus Christ was being preached daily in every house and in the Temple.

It seems Churches (in more areas than just this one) take the responsibility of the Holy Spirit working in believers upon themselves… to MAKE things happen that God would do through His children if they would only trust Him. Churches need to focus on feeding the flock God has given them, and stop neglecting the flock in their determination to gain more sheep.





Comments

John on 11 October, 2008 at 5:58 pm #

Tremendous article! I appreciate your understanding of this important issue. If we spend two hours a week in organized soul winning efforts and forget about our personal responsibility, we are not doing our job.

Quote


Joe Cassada on 11 October, 2008 at 7:03 pm #

BJH,

Indeed most IFB engage in a shallow, short-sighted approach to evangelism. Yet I do believe the Great Commission is fulfilled in a local church setting and personal venues. After all, baptizing is a local church ordinance, and baptizing is essential to fulfilling the Great Commission.

We must be careful to avoid an either/or perspective on evangelism. Especially pastors. We have few personal relations that involve lost people, so our Gospel influence is limited in that respect. We must do as Paul instructed Timothy, that is, “the work of an evangelist.”

It would be good if we would train our people proper evangelistic methods instead of the quick-prayerism that is so typical today. Christ never solicited prayers in His personal evangelism – He solicited followers. This is where modern evangelism falls short. The “teach” in the Great Commission literally means to “make disciples.” I know of few IFB churches that have that as their evangelistic focus.

Worse yet, there are plenty of us Fundamental Baptists that ridicule the usage of “disciple” as a verb. Sometimes it helps to know the Greek…knowhatImean? ;-)

Quote


John Hardin on 13 October, 2008 at 7:05 pm #

BJC, Thanks for you input. I agree with you that Christians should be properly discipled and taught proper evangelistic methods, but, as you said, there are few IFB Churches that have ‘discipleship’ as their evangelistic focus.
As far as the Great Commission goes, the Church only has two ordinances; The Lord’s Supper and Baptism. And while Baptism is to be done in the Church, I believe the process of going out into the highway’s and hedges should be done by the Church members on a daily basis… not primarily by door to door soul-winning. This way, the Church’s outreach extends much deeper into the community than just a couple of streets each week… but rather into every business, home, and every other Church. This is truly the only way a Church can extend it’s ministry as far as the Church in Acts did by “ceasing not to preach Jesus Christ in every house and in the temple daily”.
I also think Churches which only seek to grow in numbers have essentially ’shot themselves in the foot’ by failing to make disciples, and focusing on door to door sales. Think of it this way… in the business world, door to door sales were popular in the 50’s and 60’s… but it was also well known that ‘word of mouth’ was a much more effect method of sales.

Quote


Wesley Kavanagh on 15 August, 2009 at 2:33 pm #

Good article. I believe that the work of God on this earth, be it discipleship or evangelizing the lost, is to be done through the institution of the local church. There has been a HUGE failing on the part of many IFB churches of fulfilling the entire Great Commission: Go, Teach, Baptize, Teach (indoctrinate). Many go, they preach the Word, but not many get baptized, and fewer still are discipled. Too many are concerned about their statistics to be worried about “discipleship”.

Proverbs 11:30 tells us that the fruit of the righteous is a TREE of life. If I am doing all the parts of the Great Commission, then I will be producing other fruit-bearing trees, not just fruit. But that takes a LOT of work, and most guys who are in it for the numbers just aren’t willing to invest that kind of time. Trees have roots, and that means there must be grounding, and a foundation. There must be growth, and they must produce more fruit. Sounds like time and work to me!

Jesus was an evangelist. He was a preacher. He preached the Gospel, the good news. We all should follow His example. Whether it is out soul-winning on a Thursday night, or going to work on a Monday morning, or behind the pulpit on Sunday, we are to be preaching the Gospel of the kingdom.
Acts 8:4 – “Therefore they that were scattered abroad went every where preaching the word.”

Quote


Post a Comment
Name:
Email:
Website:
Comments: